Spin Semiconductor

Thank you. I've got it now. Sorry for the false start; I was too quick to post the thought/question and should have spent more time on it.

Actually I don't think that makes sense either. I'll spend some more time trying to figure this one out.

In this section: http://www.spinsemi.com/knowledge_base/pgm_quick.html#Pot_inputs It reads RDAX POT0,0.01 ;read POT0 times a small number RDAX pot0fil,0.99 ;read filter register times 1-previous coefficient WRAX pot0fil,0 ;filtered pot value ready for use in register labeled pot0fil But should the s...

In case anyone comes across this with a similar question, or in case I did something stupid that should be pointed out, here's where am at now. I haven't tested it extensively but at first blush it seems okay. sof 0, 0.999 rdax pot2, -1.0 ; (1-POT2) wrax tmp, 1 mulx tmp ; (1-POT2)^2 mulx tmp ; (1-PO...

While this is targeted at FXCore it has POT curves towards the back and the equations for the different curves so this may help: https://www.experimentalnoize.com/manuals/FXCore/app_notes/an-7.pdf Brilliant, thank you. I'll give that a go instead. Disregard my last post about the linear skipping un...

A little unconventional, but maybe another idea is to use SKP conditionals to divide it into 3 sections. Something along these lines rdax pot0, 1 skp zro, ENDPOT0 ; retain zero sof 1, -0.33 ; bottom third of travel gets 3/4 of values skp neg, QUICKTRAVEL SLOWTRAVEL: ; TODO: scale/offset 0 to 0.33 to...

I'm trying to make my pot most responsive at the very top, i.e. most pot travel gives values between 0.75 to 1. So my first (admittedly naive) assumption is to do the nth root. e.g. POT1 raised to (1/4). Is this possible or should I be trying to approximate it with some form of EXP(LOG(X)) ? Or othe...

This seems to certainly be a culprit. I was never able to fully reproduce the problem (that recording was from somebody else) without increasing the gain for testing purposes, but when I did it sounded very similar. To be safe I'm dialing it down now, then will try amplifying it on the other side of...

Yeah, those both worked beautifully, thanks. I tried both a gradual and hard-stepped version but preferred the latter since gradual seems asymmetric at lower speeds (LED appears ON more than OFF). For anyone who comes across the thread later, here's the code I used: ;--- Gradual LED indicator cho rd...

Thank you, that makes a lot of sense. I'll give it a try.

This just isn't "clicking" for me at the moment. I'm trying to use DACR to create a rate indicator LED. I have the following to simply conditionally set the output depending on the sign of SIN1: ;--- Rate indicator cho rdal, sin1 skp gez, LED_ON ; sof 0, 0 ; set ACC to zero wrax dacr, 0 ; ...

Hi Mark, from your description it sounds mode like you have a bypass switch pop noise when switching between effect and bypass rather than noise from effect changing (Sx). I would look at your bypass switching first to see if you have a problem there. OH yes, that's exactly what I think is going on...

Thank you both, this really helps.

I'll obviously try to fix the root issue first. Failing that I'll try toggling an Sx lines and waiting about 20ms, then toggling back.

For reasons (described below) I may end up needing to momentarily switch patches (S0-S2) or banks (T0) with a microcontroller, then switch it back. i.e. toggle pin 13, then toggle it back. Or the same for one of 16-18. Questions: A. Is one option faster or otherwise preferable to the other? B. What'...

I don't know how to describe it, but here's a clip: https://www.dropbox.com/s/s7uuqs07rtux4 ... k.mp3?dl=0

Does anyone know off the top of their head what might be causing it? It happens when I introduce the "Reverb_Hall" block in SpinCAD.