Search found 53 matches
- Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:45 am
- Forum: Algorithm development
- Topic: Any thoughts on implementing an "infinite hold" ef
- Replies: 42
- Views: 75897
I have not worked on this in a while. First, I switched to a delay-based approach so avoid tracking issues and the single-note limitation. Seancostello's suggestion earlier in this thread is the most promising approach. Second, Electro-Harmonix came out with the Freeze. This is exactly the effect th...
- Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:10 pm
- Forum: FV-1 software questions
- Topic: SKP out of range
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6865
Keep in mind that unlike a conventional processor, there is no advantage to skipping instructions in terms of processing time. You still only get 128 program steps, whether they are executed or not. So you can go ahead and do the processing, then just choose to use it or not. I think this is what Fr...
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:47 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Pot Tracking Speed
- Replies: 17
- Views: 34222
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:22 am
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Pot Tracking Speed
- Replies: 17
- Views: 34222
So Frank, I thought you would be pretty interested in this, since people (including me) have complained about the pot lag for a long time. It might be good for others to hear that this idea makes some sense. BTW, I hope people are still interested in the FV-1. There hasn't been much activity on the ...
- Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:34 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Pot Tracking Speed
- Replies: 17
- Views: 34222
I have been thinking about this issue for awhile, and I think I have a slick and simple solution to the pot speed issue. This should make a pot input usable for an expression pedal, for example. All that is needed is to counteract the action of the slow lowpass filter on the pot with a shelving high...
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:44 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Output noises / PCB Problem
- Replies: 18
- Views: 21463
For what it is worth, I would do the following before changing anything else: 1) Re-solder every connection on the entire board. I always use tin-lead solder for prototypes to get good flow. 2) Clean the entire board with alcohol to remove all of the flux. Make sure you get under the chip and any ot...
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:37 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Assembler and Dev Board on Win7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5076
Weird. I don't know how I got the assembler without the driver on a clean install. I uninstalled and downloaded again and Norton Antivirus blocked it. I un-quarantined it and ran it, and everything came in and worked correctly. Thanks for the super-fast response. A plug for the FV-1. To any lurkers ...
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:54 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Assembler and Dev Board on Win7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5076
Assembler and Dev Board on Win7
Hey Frank.
I have a new computer with Window & 64-bit. I installed the assembler on it with no problem. It assembles, but it doesn't see the dev board. It said that a driver was not found when I plugged into the USB.
Please don't say that you only support Windows 7 32-bit!
Thanks,
Don
I have a new computer with Window & 64-bit. I installed the assembler on it with no problem. It assembles, but it doesn't see the dev board. It said that a driver was not found when I plugged into the USB.
Please don't say that you only support Windows 7 32-bit!
Thanks,
Don
- Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:56 pm
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: Is any commercial manufacturer know wich uses the FV-1 ?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 16238
Hey Frank. You guys have posted a lot of source code for the FV-1 on the site. This is a huge help for getting people jumpstarted. This is especially true for reverb, which is quite complicated and a bit of a black art. I know you have no problem with people selling the OCT modules with their associ...
- Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:36 am
- Forum: Algorithm development
- Topic: Octave up and down
- Replies: 34
- Views: 49155
Yes, I actually have something I am almost happy with. It is pretty convoluted, though. The idea is to use a few short ramps after a note trigger to capture the transient with as little delay as possible, and then revert to the standard long ramp transpose algorithm after that. Since it is not possi...
- Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:25 am
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: OCT Effects Module Programming
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7510
Thanks B.C. Sorry, I should have been more clear. I got the dev board from OCT as well. (Funny that the OCT website doesn't list all products - only the one effects module.) Now I am looking for alternatives for some in-form-factor protos (guitar stomp boxes). The dev board is overkill for this - pr...
- Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:14 am
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: OCT Effects Module Programming
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7510
OCT Effects Module Programming
Is there any provision for customer programming of the OCT Effects Module SKRM-C8? I notice that the EEPROM is SMT, not a socketed DIP. Are the I2C lines available on a header or test points? Is the write protect line tied high or low? Does OCT sell the GA_DEMO board, which has the pots and selector...
- Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:15 am
- Forum: FV-1 software questions
- Topic: 2 second delay
- Replies: 20
- Views: 39253
What I posted was meant to be an outline of the algorithm in computer-english (pseudocode, as we call it in the biz). You need to flesh it out to FV-1 code, so it looks like: ; This example code delays an input by eight seconds. ; It inteleaves the signal 8 ways in a single max sized delay equ input...
- Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:57 am
- Forum: FV-1 software questions
- Topic: 2 second delay
- Replies: 20
- Views: 39253
I think it is just an extrapolation to a FOR-NEXT or DO-WHILE-type loop. You have to think about how the FV-1 runs through code on each pass: IF loop counter variable is 0, THEN read an input sample and put it in the temp variable. Put the temp variable in the head-end of the delay. Get a delayed sa...
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:18 am
- Forum: FV-1 hardware questions
- Topic: More than 3 pots possible?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13303
What I was proposing was switches to enable or disable steps in the arpeggio sequence, like on many synths. Then you could have a pot-skip routine to select the arpeggio pattern (ascending, descending, up/down) and for the intervals(scales, chords, etc.) This alternative would not give you the abili...