HI,
I'm looking at using the FV-1 in a design where the FV-1 acts as a send/receive FX block. There is an analog channel which must remain untouched - the FV-1 would be fed from the analog channel and a % mixed back in late in the analog chain.
Should I be concerned about the phase difference between the wet and dry signals caused by the inherent delay in the FV-1 processing? I.e. the wet signal could cancel out the dry signal at some frequencies.
In some of the commercial products that I have looked at (mixers, amplifiers, both with internal and external FX capability) I cannot see how it would be possible to adjust for phase difference so I am assuming that it is not a problem. However, just asking to make sure....
Regards,
ac
Phase difference between wet&dry signals
Moderator: frank
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:12 pm
- Contact:
If your effects are mostly of the ambience type (delays and reverbs) then I think the additional latency will not be a big deal.
A chorus also might not be too greatly affected by the latency as your wet signal is already going to be delayed some tens of milliseconds.
For a flanger, you might want to worry about it.
A chorus also might not be too greatly affected by the latency as your wet signal is already going to be delayed some tens of milliseconds.
For a flanger, you might want to worry about it.