| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
livingston
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 108 Location: New Orleans, LA US
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:33 pm Post subject: Convolution reverb? |
|
|
| I'm just curious if this is possible in the FV-1. I'm guessing it's too processor-intensive. You would need some external memory to hold the impulses, then when you want to use one you'd need to record the file into the delay memory, then some sort of multiply (but obviously not just a mulx). It's beyond me at the moment, but is it possible? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
frank
Joined: 19 Oct 2005 Posts: 338
|
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, you could probably pull off a short convolution, no where near enough points to be useful. But someone may have a trick I haven't thought of, so if you figure it out would really like to see the code. _________________ Frank Thomson
OCT Distribution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
B.C.
Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You have peaked my interest(no pun intended). I might play around with this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livingston
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 108 Location: New Orleans, LA US
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How do you plan to approach it? I couldn't think of any way to even conceptualize the code for this.
I used to have a lot of fun on computer recording systems, convolving a piano with a cymbal, for example. The convolution concept can be extended to a lot of interesting things beyond reverb. For something like this, you don't need a really long impulse, so it might be more attainable on the FV-1 than a hall reverb convolution, for example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
B.C.
Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, I plan on exploiting the idea of convolving a signal with itself. Should be a pretty interesting result sound wise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
livingston
Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 108 Location: New Orleans, LA US
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hmm, so how would that differ from multiplying a signal with itself? Is there some sort of time component? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
B.C.
Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Right, well Convolution is multiplication in the frequency domain, but in the time domain it has a time dependence. I believe I won't have to take as many samples (or atleast find a way around it) by doing it this way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|